Did Hillary Clinton Think It Was Ok to Abort a 9 Month Old Baby

© Shutterstock, screenshot/Pfizer/KJN

Vaccine makers have nothing to lose by marketing their experimental COVID-19 shots, even if they crusade serious injury and expiry, equally they enjoy total indemnity against injuries occurring from COVID-xix vaccines or whatever other pandemic vaccine under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Human action, passed in the U.Southward. in 2005.

The full extent of their COVID-nineteen vaccine indemnification agreements with countries, withal, is a closely guarded hush-hush, one that has remained highly confidential — until now. A leaked document cleaved down by Twitter user Ehden reveals the shocking terms of Pfizer's international COVID-nineteen vaccine agreements. He wrote:

"These agreements are confidential, but luckily one country did not protect the contract document well enough, and so I managed to become a agree of a copy. As you are about to run into, there is a expert reason why Pfizer was fighting to hide the details of these contracts."

An ironclad agreement, all on Pfizer's terms

The alleged indemnification agreement, reportedly between Pfizer and Republic of albania, was originally posted in snippets on Twitter, but Twitter at present has them marked as "unavailable." Copies of the tweets are bachelor on Treadreader, however.

The Albania agreement appears very like to some other contract, published online, betwixt Pfizer and the Dominican Republic. It covers not only COVID-xix vaccines, but any production that enhances the use or effects of such vaccines. Countries that purchase Pfizer'due south COVID-19 shot must admit that "Pfizer's efforts to develop and manufacture the Product" are "subject to significant risks and uncertainties."

And in the issue that a drug or other treatment comes out that can forbid, care for or cure COVID-19, the agreement stands, and the land must follow through with their lodge. Ivermectin , for instance, is not only safe, inexpensive and widely available just has been institute to reduce COVID-19 mort ality by 81% . Withal, it continues to be ignored in favor of more expensive, and less effective, treatments and mass experimental vaccination. Ehden wrote:

"If you were wondering why #Ivermectin was suppressed, well, it is considering the agreement that countries had with Pfizer does non let them to escape their contract, which states that even if a drug will be establish to care for COVID19 the contract cannot exist voided."

Even if Pfizer fails to deliver vaccine doses within their estimated commitment period, the purchaser may non abolish the order. Further, Pfizer tin can make adjustments to the number of contracted doses and their commitment schedule, "based on principles to exist determined by Pfizer," and the land ownership the vaccines must "concur to whatsoever revision."

Information technology doesn't matter if the vaccines are delivered severely late, fifty-fifty at a point when they're no longer needed, every bit it'due south made clear that

"Under no circumstances will Pfizer be subject to or liable for whatsoever late delivery penalties." As you might suspect, the contract also "forbids returns under whatever circumstances."

The big surreptitious: Pfizer charged U.S. More Than Other Countries

While COVID-nineteen vaccines are "complimentary" to receive in the U.Due south., they're existence paid for by taxpayer dollars at a rate of $19.5011 per dose. Republic of albania, the leaked contract revealed, paid $12 per dose, while the Eu paid $14.70 per shot. While charging different prices to unlike purchases is common in the drug manufacture, it's often frowned upon.

In the case of the cost disparity between the U.South. and the EU, Pfizer is said to have given a price suspension to the Eu because it financially supported the development of their COVID-nineteen vaccine. Still, Ehden noted, "U.S. taxpayers got screwed past Pfizer, probably besides Israel." As well, Pfizer makes a point to annotation that countries accept no right to withhold payment to the company for any reason.

Plain, this includes in the case of receiving damaged goods. Purchasers of Pfizer's COVID-nineteen vaccines are not entitled to reject them "based on service complaints," unless they do not suit to specifications or the FDA'south Current Good Manufacturing Practice regulations. And, Ehden adds, "This agreement is above any local law of the state."

While the purchaser has virtually no way of canceling the contract, Pfizer can cease the agreement in the event of a "material breach" of any term in their contract.

Safety and efficacy 'not currently known'

The purchaser of Pfizer'south COVID-19 vaccine must as well acknowledge two facts that accept largely been brushed nether the rug: Both their efficacy and risks are unknown. According to department 5.v of the contract:

"Purchaser acknowledges that the Vaccine and materials related to the Vaccine, and their components and constituent materials are being rapidly adult due to the emergency circumstances of the COVID-nineteen pandemic and will continue to exist studied after provision of the Vaccine to Purchaser under this Agreement.

"Purchaser further acknowledges that the long-term furnishings and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that at that place may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known."

Indemnification past the purchaser is also explicitly required by the contract, which states, nether section 8.1:

"Purchaser hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and concord harmless Pfizer, BioNTech, each of their Affiliates, contractors, sub-contractors, licensors, licensees, sub-licensees, distributors, contract manufacturers, services providers, clinical trial researchers, third parties to whom Pfizer or BioNTech or any of their corresponding Affiliates may straight or indirectly owe an indemnity based on the research ...
"from and against any and all suits, claims, deportment, demands, losses, damages, liabilities, settlements, penalties, fines, costs and expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees and other expenses of an investigation or litigation ... arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the Vaccine ..."

Meanwhile, the purchaser must likewise go along the terms of the contract confidential for a period of 10 years.

Not only does Pfizer have total indemnification, simply at that place's likewise a section in the contract titled, "Assumption of Defense by Purchaser," which states that in the event Pfizer suffers losses for which information technology is seeking indemnification, the purchaser

"shall promptly assume conduct and control of the defense force of such Indemnified Claims on behalf of the Indemnitee with counsel acceptable to Indemnitee(s), whether or not the Indemnified Merits is rightfully brought."

Ehden notes:

"Pfizer is making certain the country volition pay for everything: 'Costs and expenses, including ... fees and disbursements of counsel, incurred by the Indemnitee(s) in connection with whatever Indemnified Claim shall be reimbursed on a quarterly footing by Purchaser.'"

Cached in the March 17, 2020, Federal Register — the daily journal of the U.S. regime — in a document titled, "Announcement Nether the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act for Medical Countermeasures Against COVID-19," is language that establishes a new COVID-xix vaccine courtroom — like to the federal vaccine court that already exists.

In the U.S., vaccine makers already enjoy total indemnity against injuries occurring from this or whatsoever other pandemic vaccine under the PREP Act. If you're injured by a COVID vaccine (or a select group of other vaccines designated under the human activity), you'd have to file a bounty claim with the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP), which is funded by U.S. taxpayers via Congressional appropriation to the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS).

While similar to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Plan (NVICP), which applies to nonpandemic vaccines, the CICP is fifty-fifty less generous when information technology comes to compensation. As reported by Dr. Meryl Nass, the maximum payout you can receive — fifty-fifty in cases of permanent inability or death — is $250,000 per person; all the same, you'd have to exhaust your private insurance policy before the CICP gives y'all a dime.

The CICP too has a one-yr statute of limitations, then you lot have to act quickly, which is too difficult since it's unknown if long-term effects could occur more than a year later.

Pfizer accused of abuse of power

As is apparent in Pfizer's confidential contract with Albania, the drug giant wants governments to guarantee the company will exist compensated for any expenses resulting from injury lawsuits against it. Pfizer has also demanded that countries put upwards sovereign assets , including bank reserves, military bases and embassy buildings, as collateral for expected vaccine injury lawsuits resulting from its COVID-xix inoculation.

New Delhi-based World Is One News (WION) reported in February 2021 that Brazil rejected Pfizer'due south demands, calling them "calumniating." The demands included that Brazil:

1. "Waives sovereignty of its assets abroad in favor of Pfizer."
2. Not apply its domestic laws to the visitor.
3. Non penalize Pfizer for vaccine delivery delays.
4. Exempt Pfizer from all civil liability for side effects.

STAT News too referred to concerns by legal experts, who besides suggested Pfizer's demands were an abuse of power. Mark Eccleston-Turner, a lecturer in global health law at Keele University in England, told STAT:

"[Pfizer] is trying to eke out as much profit and minimize its gamble at every juncture with this vaccine development and so this vaccine rollout. Now, the vaccine development has been heavily subsidized already. So there's very minimal risk for the manufacturer involved in that location."

Signs of COVID vaccine failure, agin furnishings rise

Pfizer continues to sign lucrative secret vaccine deals across the globe. In June 2021, they signed one of their biggest contracts to engagement — with the Philippine regime for 40 meg doses .

Meanwhile, COVID-19 "breakthrough cases," which used to exist called vaccine failures, are on the rise. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Command and Prevention (CDC), as of July 19, 5,914 people who had been fully vaccinated for COVID-19 were hospitalized or died from COVID-19.

In the U.Grand., equally of July fifteen, 87.5% of the developed population had received one dose of COVID-19 vaccine and 67.1% had received ii. Yet, symptomatic cases amidst partially and fully vaccinated are on the rise , with an boilerplate of 15,537 new infections a 24-hour interval being detected, a 40% increment from the week before.

In a July 19 report from the CDC, the agency also reported that the Vaccine Agin Result Reporting Organization (VAERS) had received 12,313 reports of death among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine — more than doubling from the 6,079 reports of death from the week before.

Soon after the written report, however, they reverted the number to the half dozen,079 from the week before, indicating past default that no deaths from the vaccine had occurred that week, raising serious questions about transparency and vaccine safety.

Many other adverse events are also appearing, ranging in risks from the biologically active SARS-CoV-two fasten protein used in the vaccine to blood clots, reproductive toxicity and myocarditis ( heart inflammation ). As you tin run into in the confidential indemnification agreements, however, even if the vaccine turns out to exist a dismal failure — and a run a risk to short- and long-term health — countries have no recourse, nor does anyone who received the experimental shots.

One question that we should all be asking is this: If the COVID-19 vaccines are, in fact, as safe and effective every bit the manufacturers merits, why do they crave this level of indemnification?

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children's Wellness Defense.

wenmislivend.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.sott.net/article/456611-Leaked-document-reveals-shocking-terms-of-Pfizers-international-vaccine-agreements-Childrens-Health-Defense